Guest View
User: Pass: | become a member


The Oxen Report: Looking Long Term at an Overvalued Coffee Company

TGIF! We had a really great week thus far, and I want to close it out with looking into a long term position. Yesterday, we had a fairly successful day as we closed two positions in Exide Technologies (XIDE) and Quiksilver (ZQK). XIDE was our Overnight Trade from Wednesday that we entered at 4.00. The company reported stellar earnings, and I was able to sell yesterday morning at 5.45 for a 38% gain in just one day!!! Quiksilver, which was our Play of the Week, was entered on Tuesday at 4.60. We were looking to gain 4-6% for the week and were able to exit yesterday at 4.78. I wish we would have continue holding it, however, as the company reported very strong earnings and is up 11% today. Our Short Sale of the Day, yesterday, in ERY was a hold for the day. We bought in the morning at 11.60, and we sold it at the end of the day at 11.40 for a near 2% gain. It was a great day. The market is looking quite terrible today, so it is a great time to open a new long position.

As a preview, the graph on the left shows you the average amount of cups of coffee an adult in each country consumes on a daily basis. It is pretty staggering to see how much is consumed, but it is also interesting to see the business potential in the industry. I guess those Scandinavians really love their coffee. Interestingly, producers are not big consumers. It may have something to do with weather…

And onto the investment…

 

Long Term Investment: Green Mountain Coffee Roasters Inc. (GMCR)

 

Thesis
 
The coffee industry is one that has been dominated by only a few players for years. The likes of Starbucks, Maxwell House, Folger’s, and more recently Dunkin’ Donuts have ruled the market share of coffee. Over the past few years, however, Green Mountain Coffee Roasters has begun to establish itself as another major player in the industry through its two-pronged approach of selling coffee beans and grounds through distributors and selling instant-brew machines through its Keurig brand that offer single cup servings of coffee and tea right into a cup rather than pot.
 
In the past five years, GMCR has increased its revenue by 400%. The company has increased its income by 500%. The company has seen substantial growth, and it is actually surpassed Folger’s and Maxwell House in sales this past year. The company’s stock as a result has taken the same path over the past five years, rising from 2.30 a share five years ago to 24.00 per share today – an increase of nearly 950%, and today’s price is down from a high in the 33s the company saw earlier this year. Green Mountain has definitely gotten its foot in the door and established itself as a leader in the coffee industry; however, the company has grown at phenomenal rates over the past few years. The company in its latest quarter for the first time could not meet the estimates that people were expecting with the same extraordinary growth rate.
 
The problem with GMCR is that it has had significant growth. It is up over 6,000% in ten years, and as a result, it has an extremely high valuation. The company recently did a 3-1 stock split to attempt to pyschologically improve that shares are cheaper than they actually are, but it does not change the stocks P/E ratio, which is sitting well above 40. At any signs of weakness, this stock price will come crashing down. What has fueled its recent drop from $33 to $24? It was a combination of a weak market, combined with the fact that the company reported lower than expected outlook for its next quarter. Even though the company had 68% increase in sales, the company could not meet expectations.
 
GMCR is going to slow down and it will not be able to maintain its current high valuation as it continues to slow down. In Q1 of 2010, while reporting a 200 basis point upswing in gross margins to 30% and a 77% increase in sales year-over-year, the company actually saw its net income decrease to $12.5 million when excluding a litigation settlement, which was a decrease of 13% from the year prior. This past quarter income grew 90%, but it is a drop from 2009 gains. The company, while still growing and will continue to grow, is slowing down, and those two words truly do threaten GMCR.
 
Since 2007, the growth rate of the company has been at over 60%. As Chuck Carnevale comments in his article,How to Tell if Its Time to Sell, Part 2, “forecast from ten analysts reporting to FirstCall of 28% growth for the next five years. Zacks reports a consensus 5-year forecast of 31% earnings growth. Both of these numbers are consistent with longer history and could conceivably be achieved. On that basis, Green Mountain Coffee Roasters is a sound sell candidate.”
 
One of the ways that the company continues to see growth is by a number of buy-outs. The company has continued to buy up its distribution line and sellers of its Keurig brand. Recently, the company completed another acquistion of Diedrich Coffee. One of the issues with this is that the company is lacking a lot of free cash flow. In the past six years, the company has only finished two years with free cash flow, and in the past two years they have had negative cash flow of over $55 million.
 
Further, the company has very low net margins. They do no turn a lot of revenue into income with net margins around 5-6%. Most strong long term investments are around 15% because it means the company does not have a lot of selling, general, and administrative expenses and interest payemnts. GMCR has really great gross margins above 25%, but they have net margins around 6%. That discrepancy shows way too much money is being serviced into debt and administrative expenses. The company’s profitability will need to have a lot of sustained revenue growth to cover the expenses in debt and takeovers. As they start to reach limits in selling capacities, they will being to start to see problems in profitability.
 
Another issue to raise is that GMCR is seeing is accounts receivable outgrow its sales at an alarming rate. A company never wants to have a much higher perecentage growth in accounts receivable over sales. The company has seen accounts receivable grow in Q1 of 2010 100%, while sales only grew 77%. The problem here is that inventory starts to build up as the company thinks too greatly to the future, and it causes inventory markdowns, lower profitability, and costs of storage.
 
The company’s ability to be efficient has gotten better over the years, and it has allowed the company to continue to see great growth. Yet, in 2010 so far, the company is seeing the days sales outstanding start to rise, the cash conversion cycle decreasing, and inventory turnover taking much longer. There is definitely an issue in GMCR’s distribution line that is going to need to be fixed because again it will threaten the company’s ability to expand.
 
All these issues with an overvaluation create a major dilemma for the company, and competition still looms…
 
Finally, GMCR has competition. Starbucks, Maxwell House, Folgers, Dunkin’ Donuts, McDonald’s, and others are all in this industry. These are established companies that have lost market share to GMCR’s success. Each of these companies is beginning to realize that the K-Cup is extremely successful product. In the fast-paced economy in which we live, the single serving cup is a great way to get coffee and go. Starbucks released their VIA line and Maxwell House is about to undergo a major promotions campaign in Q3 of 2010. These companies will not be undone and should begin to tap into GMCR’s recipe for success. The competition is definitely there, and while GMCR has created a small economic moat with its K-Cup idea, the idea is obviously one that can be adapted by other companies established.
 
 
Valuation
 
My fair value estimate for Green Mountain Coffee Roasters is $15.63 per share based on a discounted cash-flow analysis. The company has seen incredible growth in its operating income in the past five years, but the amount of growth the company has seen will start to decline. As that declines, the company will not be able to maintain its extreme valuation. Additionally, the company has shown a number of financial issues with profitability and efficiency this year, which should threaten the company. Further, they have no free cash flow, which is the red alarm that further growth is threatened. My estimated available cash flow starts at $160 million for this year, which is a best-case scenario for the company moving forward.
 
Risk
 
Risk is medium with Green Mountain Coffee Roasters. The company has been for the past couple years been told it could not continue at this rate, and they have. Yet, over the past couple years they have improved everything from growth, to profitability ratios, to financial health, to efficiency. For the first time, we are starting to actually see these numbers start to not be able to maintained or slow down. That threatens the company. Yet, the K-Cup is very popular, and if the company can overcome some of the obstacles and maintain a high level of growth, there stock is in good shape.
 
 
Management & Stewardship
 
President and CEO Lawrence J. Blanford has been with the company since May of 2007. He has a background in consumer goods but on the technology side. He was involved with Philips, Maytag, and Royal Tech before involving himself with Green Mountain. One issue with with Green Mountain is that it does not seperate its CEO and President title. Another issue with Blanford is that he has in just three years seen his compensation triple while most other board members have seen no increase. One positive is that the company’s Chairman and former CEO before Blanford, Robert Stiller, holds a 51% stake in the company. Therefore, he treats the company like a shareholder. The move from him to Blanford was seen as a move to help take the company to the next level.
 
Overview
 
Growth: The company has seen a 550% increase in its operating income in the past five years. These results have been pretty stable in growth, but the company has seen a slowdown in year-to-year growth this year. It saw a 100% increase from 08-09, but it is only expecting a minor increase of less than 20% this year.
 
Profitability: The company should continue to maintain its operating margins above the 10% range, which is very high. The company will continue to remain profitable, but the amount of SG&A and interest expenses the company has continue to demand a lot of revenue. As that slow downs, profitability will decrease. Additionally, the lack of any free cash flow is a deteriment to profitability.
 
Financial Health: The company is in very solid financial condition. The company has decreased its current liabilities over the past few years and has a solid current ratio. The company does have some long term debt, but it has been reduced significantly over the past couple years, as well.

 

Entry: We are looking to get involved in a short sale at 24.05 – 24.15.

Exit: We are looking to cover around 17-18, which is where I have my fair value estimate for GMCR.

Stop Loss: None

 

Good Investing,

David Ristau

Do you know someone who would benefit from this information? We can send your friend a strictly confidential, one-time email telling them about this information. Your privacy and your friend's privacy is your business... no spam! Click here and tell a friend!



Comments


  1. David Ristau

    Oxen Alert – New Position

    You can read about a new position I am getting into in my new Long Term Portfolio. I am taking up a short sale of Green Mountain Coffee Roasters. The company is currently overvalued compared to my fair value estimation. I like the company to move down to the 12-15 range from its 23-24 range over the long term. 

    I entered the stock today at 24.05.

    Check out the financial report here.

    Good Investing!

  2. yipcarl

    David…there you are!  I like this play simply because I think this market is oversold (I actually think the Dow should be at 5000 but I’m apparently the only one who thinks that) The kool aide is good! 
    You entered at 24.05 with a 3% stop?  so around 23.30?

  3. yipcarl

    OH?!  It’s a short…how did you get 24.05??

  4. David Ristau

     Yip -

    This is a long term short sale. So, I got involved at 24.05. I am looking long term to exit for gains of 30, 40. 50%. I think this one actually is going to come down quite significantly over the next year or two. This is part of a new portfolio I am doing looking at things more long term rather than just for a day or two. I don’t really have a stop loss set. I would probably sell it if I start to lose 20-30% in a year or two…

  5. shadowfax

    David
    I know a bunch of investors from NY who made a killing on Green Mountain, all out now, and a broker from the APPLE called and recomended the stock. Contra I think your right on this. If it isn’t in you post could you add a time? Will read all later.

  6. yipcarl

    How is it that most of the time within like 4 minutes of you putting out your reports the stocks move so much?  Maybe you should get out your reco’s earlier… I don’t get it

  7. aclend

    David,
    Do you have a log of your results thus far? You seem to be doing very well so I want to do some of your trades. What is the effect of a short sale on margin? Does it add cash like an option sale?

  8. David Ristau

    Shadow -

    Time as in how long I want to hold for? If that is the case, I am looking 6 months on… I am looking more for it to hit a price level.

    Yip -

    Stocks just move a lot. If we are looking to hold for a long time Yip, then you can get it in at any time. That is the thing about long term investing. The 30 cent moves aren’t important, it is all about the macro approach. We want to be concerned about $5 – $10 movements. If you want to buy, you can get at any time.

    Aclend -

    I just did a portfolio update recently. Here is the link: The Oxen Report: 2010 $10000 Buy Pick Portfolio Up 18.5% with 75% Success Rate, Short Sale Up Nearly 8%. Short sale on margin explanation:

     

    In the case of a short sale, the trader is borrowing, not cash, but rather securities, and margin rules apply here as well. The margin quantities, in this case is computed as follows:
     , where the loan amount is the market value of the security borrowed at the time that the margin is being computed. Hence, if Tina sold short 200 shares of WMT (Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.), when the stock was selling at $25, assuming a 50% initial margin, she would have had to put $25 x 200 x 50% = $2500 into her account., so that the loan of 200 x $25 or $5000 satisfies  , where the first term of $5000 in the numerator refers to the original proceeds of the short sale of stock, the second term of $2500 refers to the money that was put up as margin, and the third term of $5000 refers to the value of the loan made to the trader. Just as in the case of a margin purchase, we have maintenance margin requirements here, as well. Suppose this is 25%. Then, if the market value of the stock rises to $35, the actual margin, now, is  . Since this is less than 25%, Tina must put up enough money to bring up the margin to the required initial margin of 50%, once again. This amount of money can be computed by solving the equation  , which works out to $3000.
  9. David Ristau

    Shadow -

    By time what do you mean? If you mean the length I want to hold, I am looking at probably 6 months or more. I am looking more for it reach a price level near $15 rather than time length. If I am misunderstanding the question, can you explain more?

    Yip -

    Well, we are looking at this one long term, so the short movement is really not important. I am looking at movement over 6 – 12 months, not just the day. If it moves 20-30 cents, it is not too key to the $5 – $10 movement. If you want to buy long term, you should buy at any price above $22.

  10. David Ristau

    Aclend -

    I do have a log. I recently did a portfolio update with all my positions for the year. Here is the link: The Oxen Report: 2010 $10000 Buy Pick Portfolio Up 18.5% with 75% Success Rate, Short Sale Up Nearly 8%

    Short sale on margin explanation:

     

    In the case of a short sale, the trader is borrowing, not cash, but rather securities, and margin rules apply here as well. The margin quantities, in this case is computed as follows:
     , where the loan amount is the market value of the security borrowed at the time that the margin is being computed. Hence, if Tina sold short 200 shares of WMT (Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.), when the stock was selling at $25, assuming a 50% initial margin, she would have had to put $25 x 200 x 50% = $2500 into her account., so that the loan of 200 x $25 or $5000 satisfies  , where the first term of $5000 in the numerator refers to the original proceeds of the short sale of stock, the second term of $2500 refers to the money that was put up as margin, and the third term of $5000 refers to the value of the loan made to the trader. Just as in the case of a margin purchase, we have maintenance margin requirements here, as well. Suppose this is 25%. Then, if the market value of the stock rises to $35, the actual margin, now, is  . Since this is less than 25%, Tina must put up enough money to bring up the margin to the required initial margin of 50%, once again. This amount of money can be computed by solving the equation  , which works out to $3000.
  11. David Ristau

     Aclend -

    I do have a log. I recently did a portfolio update with all my positions for the year. Here is the link: The Oxen Report: 2010 $10000 Buy Pick Portfolio Up 18.5% with 75% Success Rate, Short Sale Up Nearly 8%

    Short sale on margin explanation:

     

    In the case of a short sale, the trader is borrowing, not cash, but rather securities, and margin rules apply here as well. The margin quantities, in this case is computed as follows: market asset values – loan divided by loan , where the loan amount is the market value of the security borrowed at the time that the margin is being computed. Hence, if Tina sold short 200 shares of WMT (Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.), when the stock was selling at $25, assuming a 50% initial margin, she would have had to put $25 x 200 x 50% = $2500 into her account., so that the loan of 200 x $25 or $5000 satisfies 0.5 from the equation above, where the first term of $5000 in the numerator refers to the original proceeds of the short sale of stock, the second term of $2500 refers to the money that was put up as margin, and the third term of $5000 refers to the value of the loan made to the trader. Just as in the case of a margin purchase, we have maintenance margin requirements here, as well. Suppose this is 25%. Then, if the market value of the stock rises to $35, the actual margin, now, is 7.14% . Since this is less than 25%, Tina must put up enough money to bring up the margin to the required initial margin of 50%, once again.

  12. concreata

    David – in your discounted cf analysis, what growth rate did you assume and what discount rate did you use to get present value of $15.63? Thanks

  13. David Ristau

    Concreata -

    I had a growth rate of declining value for the next five years on operating income from 17% for 2010 to 13% for the next two years after and then for another 10% the year after that and then 8%.

    My discount rate was a PV factor on WACC at 8%. 

    Here is the DCF

  14. shadowfax

    You got it dead on my time 6 to 12 monthsI will read the hbanna later. Today is shoud have shorted everything.

  15. David Ristau

    Shadow -

    Thanks!

  16. biodieselchris

    David you really stirred up the hornets nest on the GMCR message board. I found that highly amusing after of a tough day of fighting in the trenches at my day job (thanks for the entertainment!). 
     
    I had a similar experience awhile back before the Great Mortgage Crisis. Having a solid, long-term put option position in this total piece of shit scam company, Novastar Financial (NFI, at the time), I posted a one liner on the MB never having read any board posts that I had taken up such a  position and man, these people came out of the frickin’ woodwork, and just went off.  I was a ‘scam paid short,’ ‘shrill’ conspiracy, the who nine.  I was like "Whoa, time to double down on this position, these people are delusional.’ They even had a site, NFI-info.net that some pumper ran that justified the 24% dividend and "how this time it was different" kinda stuff.  I think that guy might have actually killed himself when the shit hit the fan. Pretty sad, but people are unreasonable, so ignore them (or better yet, stay off of Yahoo altogether."

  17. concreata

    David – thanks for the spreadsheet.  Why is there such a large recovery of W/C in 2010, 2011, and 2012 considering if Capex continues at high levels (which increases W/C outflows) – is it because you assuming they improve DSO and bloated inventory offsetting cap expenditure W/C needs? Also, appears 2014 residual cf of 2307.5 is using 4 yr 8% PV factor, not 5 yr (assuming you are discounted this sum back 5 yrs) this would lower implied price per share to ~$14.70. Overall, looks like you have given them benefit of the doubt – even with good performance their long term share price looks under pressure.

  18. pstas

    David,
    Hey, I like your DCF spreadsheet. Could you see your way clear to send me a copy? I am assuming it is an Excel spreadsheet?
    Email – philstas1011@gmail.com
    Thanks,

  19. David Ristau

    Concreata – Well, I think they have taken on a lot of liabilities as of late which was not on average with their consistency of increasing working capital year to year. So, I think that they will continue to increase working capital as they took on a lot of liabilites as of recent.

     

    Pstas – Sent it.

     

    Bio – I just won’t even get into it.

  20. gel1

    David
    You have provided a very comprehensive analysis. I notice you did not include Peets, and it could be because of their percentage of market share. Peets is aggressive and that, additionally, does not bode well for GMCR. I plan to join you on this play, but thought I would buy puts, as margin is not an issue. I have yet to lose a dime on any of your picks, and many thanks again for your great stuff!

  21. biodieselchris

     I had 10 contracts on the 30 put pre-split (now 30 @ 13.33 strike). Just wondering why a long term play like this you wouldn’t just front the cash for OTM puts and forget about it?

  22. concreata

    David – As a claim on cash flow, Your sheet shows W/C being deducted  in black numbers from 2005 – 2009,  then added in red numbers from 2010 – 2014. This implies W/C is actually going down not up during forecast period and instead of claim on cash flow its recovery give back??

  23. biodieselchris

     after reading the cheerleader section of their annual report I gotta say if the Single-Cup market star is still rising I’d rather have outs outright than be naked short.  This could easily go 5X before the fad fades away and goes all CROC on you (which will eventually happen, but just timing it is so important with shorting).
     
    Sure it’s just coffee so other guys like Mars’ "FLAVIO" will take market share but the brand is still a rising star IMO. Kind of like NFLX, its easy to mail DVD’s around but their is only one NFLX.

  24. biodieselchris

     "outs" = "puts". Sry :)

  25. David Ristau

    Gel – Thank you.

    Bio – I just do stocks over options. I have some understanding of them, but I am more comfortable with stocks. I think this was directed at me?

    And I agree that this is a company that has risen fast. It may gain market share and sustain, but even if it has pretty significant growth in the next five years, it is overvalued.

    Concreata – Yes they increased their WC significantly in 2009 to 2008, adn the projections for 2010 are showing assets decreasing and liabilities increasing. Moving forward I think this trend will continue as they are not able to take on as many mergers and will have a lower current asset to liability ratio. They have rising interest on debts to pay for these mergers and are taking on more debt to finance since they have no free cash flow.

  26. gel1

    GMCR isat the peak of their hype, reflecting a P/E of 40. This is a company selling a commodity, and subject to a lot of competition, and no propietary, patent protected product. Looks like a good short to me, in a very nervous market that is looking for a reason to go down.

  27. David Ristau

    Gel1 -

    I agree.

Dashboard

 Sector Performances (Today)

 Thermal Imaging