Guest View
User: Pass: | become a member


The Oxen Report: Looking Long Term in Something Sunny

Hey all. Happy Friday. We had a really great week this week with a number of stellar plays. Yesterday, we made it the second day in a row for three profitable trades as we closed out positions in Quidel (QDEL), Big Lots (BIG), and Verifone (PAY). Quidel was yestreday’s first Buy Pick of the Day. We got involved at 11.33, and we exited in the morning at 11.74 for a 4% gain as the company moved up with the  market and an upgrade. BIG was our Play of the Week from Monday. We got involved at 36.50 on Monday, looking for 4-6% throughout the week. Unfortunately, the stock never hit 4%, so we had to settle for just a 2% gain, exiting at 37.24. Finally, we had a BIG WINNER in Verifone for our second Overnight Trade from Wednesday to Thursday. We got involved at 17.25 on Wednesday, and I exited in the morning yesterday at 18.65 for an 8.5% gain!!!

Today, I am going to cap off the week by changing things up with an investigation into the long term prospects for the solar company Trina Solar. The report will also begin a brand new Fund/virtual Portfolio that I will be tracking long term. These plays could range from a couple months to a year to longer. I won’t be monitoring them as frequently as my other trades, but they will be followed for developments and percentage gained and lost. This will be something I will be doing every Friday.

 

Long Term Investment of the Week: Trina Solar Ltd. (TSL)

 

Thesis
 

Solar energy has continued to be one of the most challenging industries to predict, Many of the companies involved continueto operate with low margins and struggle to continually be profitable. The market is overcrowded with too many companies, offering mostly similar silicon photovoltaic modules, and subsidies from various governments that have helped to establish the infant solar industry are being cut. Yet, among all these risks, a handful of companies have established themselves as the market leaders with continual growth, diversification across several markets, and the most efficient products.

 
Trina Solar Ltd. (TSL), based in China, has become a market leader in a competitive industry that has continued to grow at more than 15% every year for the past six years. The company, led by founder and CEO Jifan Gao, has continually seen its revenue and profits increase every year since its founding. The solar market is starting to become a larger part of the energy picture with the USA looking at solar more considerably vis-a-vis the California Solar Initiative. The company offers the second-most efficient photovoltaic cell among all its peers, which has helped it to create a minute economic moat.
 
Further, the company has been able to reduce its production costs considerably with the ability to now turn its raw silicon into a solar panel for only $0.78 per watt, which is the lowest of all competitors. This ability to poduce a highly efficient, marketable good with the lowest costs allows Trina to continue to produce significant earnings and margins over 30%. The only other company that has lower costs than Trina is First Solar (FSLR), which uses cadmium telluride for their cells instead of silicon. In the highly competitive solar industry with similar products, the two things that matter most are costs of production and efficiency of sells. Trina is a leader in both.
 
Trina does face stiff competition in the solar energy market. There are over 35 public solar energy companies on the NYSE that are competition with Trina. Most of these companies are small and do not compete on the same level as Trina. For example, at the end of 2009, Trina Solar, under the California Solar Initiative (CSI), had less than 5% of the market share. With a focus on diversifying into America (the company has signed its third agreement with a US distributor as of April 2010), the company has quickly taken the place of many other more expensive, less efficient companies and gained 16% of the market share. While the company does not have a niche in the industry due to similar products. The solar industry is basically a commodities market. The cheapest company with the best product is the winner, and that has become a horse race between a handful of the solar giants, which has allowed Trina to gain a very small economic moat.
 
The company also faces a major crisis in Europe with the declining Euro. In 2009, the company did 90% of its business in the Germany, Spain, Benelux region. Yet, the company has realized that there is a great need for them to diversify away from the European region and move towards China and the USA. The company plans to transport 100 MW of energy to the USA in 2010 and improve that to 150 MW by 2011. The movement into the USA, China, and other emerging solar markets will help Trina to battle the Euro woes in Europe and better diversify itself for the future. Additionally, the company has used subsidies from Germany, the current European leader for solar panel production, and other European nations for a long amount of time to keep prices even lower. Now more than ever, with Germany planning to continually reduce its feed-in tariffs (FITs), it is crucial for solar companies to be able to produce the most inexpensive solar panels, a la Trina.
 
Further, the outlook for solar is not at all cloudy or a bad one despite the Euro woes and Germany’s subsidy cuts. According to Credit Suisse, the global demand for solar energy should rise from 10 gigawatts to 12.7 gigawatts on the year as economies start to recover and the price of oil remains high. The rise in demand of solar continues to increase each year. In 2008, the demand was just 6 GW and was just 1.7 GW in 2006. This industry is growing very rapidly, and the solar shares are extremely cheap compared to where these could go in the next five years.
 
Finally, the latest quarter for Trina continues to show that the company is finding ways to make money in tough markets by offering the best product in a commodities market. The company in Q4 of 2009 estimated their margins below 30, which sent shares into a downfall. They commented on the Euro problems as the main reason to estimate them around 26-27. Yet, the company reported margins at 33 for Q1 2010 despite the decline of the Euro throughout the beginning of this year. While the Euro’s problems should be worrisome, this is a company that can continue to grow even in a tough market. Once the European market stabilizes and they further diversify, the prospects are very bright.
 
The company has continued to improve their business each year. They have increased their margins each year, in existence on the NYSE from 9.8% in 2004 to over 30% in 2010. The company has improved their return on equity from 2006 – 2010, going from 14.5% to projected 23% this year. That is a very significant ROE. The company also is becoming more and more financially healthy. They have continued to reduce their current liabilities and increase cash on hand over the past five years.
While questions remain about competition, diversification, and subsidy issues, Trina Solar has established itself as a solar leader in this market. It is a company that has the fundamentals necessary to make a significant move in the industry.
 
Valuation
 
My fair value estimate for Trina Solar is $30 per share based on a discounted cash-flow analysis. The company has seen incredible growth in its operating income in the past five years, and there is really no worry that the industry cannot continue to grow as demand continues to grow. Given the development of new markets, the company’s ability to offer the cheapest product and second-most efficent, and continued growth of capacity of MW the company can produce per year, the company is continuing to offer growth in its income. My estimated available cash flow starts at $79 million for this year, which is somewhat cautious compared to estimates to help with the Euro problems. The company, however, should continue to grow those numbers with an increasing number of MW they can produce and new markets.
 
Risk
 
Risk is medium with Trina Solar. The company, in the last five years, has been able to definitely develop itself as a leader, but it is in a commodities industry. If another company can find a way to beat out Trina for watt to raw silicon production prices, then Trina will not have as much of an upper hand. Questions about the Euro and subsidies remain in the short term, but they could create long term issues for solar companies if they fall out of favor due to rising prices. Upturn in the global economy would do wonders for solar energy.
 

Management & Stewardship
 
CEO and Chairman Jifan Gao has done wonders for his company that he has founded. He is a veteran of industry, having worked with two other chemical based companies prior to starting Trina Solar. One worry is that there is no information about salary, compensation, etc. on any of the management for Trina since the company is based in China. The inability to access that information and having foreign leaders is a slight risk to consider. Additionally, it would be better if their was a split of the chairman and CEO position that Gao currently holds.
 
 
Overview
 
Growth: The company has averaged 154% increases in its operating income in the past five years. These results have been pretty stable, but there was a siginificant slowdown in 2009. The company should continue to offer above 20-25% growth for years to come.
 
Profitability: The company should continue to maintain its operating margins above the 10% range, which is very high. The company will continue to remain profitable, but the Euro and subsidy cuts do cause some problems. The company, however, will most likely battle this in the short term with higher prices.
 
Financial Health: The company is in very solid financial condition. The company has decreased its current liabilities over the past five years and has a solid current ratio. The company does have some long term debt, but this is definitely expected in a high technological institution that operates large factories with expensive equipment and design.
 

 

 

Good Investing,

David Ristau

Do you know someone who would benefit from this information? We can send your friend a strictly confidential, one-time email telling them about this information. Your privacy and your friend's privacy is your business... no spam! Click here and tell a friend!



Comments


  1. jromeha

    Like the pick D, know you’re a fan of FSLR but I really think TSL, STP, and other vert-integrated chinese companies will catch and surpass FSLR sooner rather than later…

  2. David Ristau

    Jro -

    Thank you. The more I look at TSL and STP the more I agree. I do think the silicon vs. cadmium debate is one that is not resolved. With lower demand for cadmium, FSLR has the upper hand on price per watt of production, but TSL has some definite advantages in its capitalization.

    Should be interesting…

  3. David Ristau

    Position Update – Trina Solar Inc.

    Per my new Long Term Portfolio I am starting and my post this morning, I am moving into a position long term with Trina Solar. I am buying at market price right now, which is 17.65. I am going to monitor the stock over the coming months, and I have a target price set at $30 per share.

    I am highly recommending entering TSL over the long term.

    Good Investing!

  4. morxlntway

    Hi David, I have LDK for $8. Been Dbl downing & selling calls since we got into this last year. Do  you think it will see $8 again anytime soon or would i be better taking the loss & going for something more sure?
    thanks

  5. David Ristau

    Morx -

    LDK is one of those that looked like it was going to be in the hunt with First Solar, Trina, and Suntech, and it has not been. LDK has swung back to profit, and the solar industry I think is growing. It definitely can retake 8, but I would expect it take a couple month. I think that you have to worry about the Euro’s effect on this company since they have a higher cost of production. I think 8 – 10 is possible, but it is not going to be a leader in this market. I would look TSL, FSLR, or STP to make some large long term gains.

  6. David Ristau

     Oh my…look at that chart on the DOW

  7. David Ristau

     

    The Daily Discourse – The Failure of the Fossil Fuels Market and Its Alternative…Solar Power, Part 3
     
    The final part of my three part series on the benefits of solar energy ends today with this section on more of the benefits of solar energy and how some nations are using solar energy to help their countries become more economically efficient:
     
    Another major benefit of solar energy is that it is a hedge against future price increases in the fossil fuel market. Since the market for fossil fuels, as has been discussed, is continually seeing increasing demand against somewhat stagnant and mysterious supply levels, the fossil fuel market prices will most likely continue to increase over the next fifty years. The cost of solar, currently, is higher than these utilities, especially in urban areas. Yet, the price is continually declining in solar. Therefore, one can create a smart hedge by moving their energy production towards solar and away from fossil fuels. This hedge will allow one to pay less and less over time in the solar industry comparatively to the oil market.
     
    The money that will be saved by switching to the solar industry would be exceptional, especially as the scarcity of these fossil fuels increases and can be used for various other developments. This benefit of solar industry is a definite economic benefit that could be valued through hedonic pricing method. If one looks at the value of a property that uses solar energy to fuel itself versus property that uses fossil fuels, one could look over time at the market price of solar energy eventually being much more cost effective than the property with fossil fuels. If the theory hold trues that fossil fuel prices will increase over time, the value of the prior property will be higher. The energy aspect of any home, building, or apartment is extremely important to the value of that home. As fossil fuels grow in price, it would make the value of a home with solar panels much more affordable and wanted. The environmental improvements additionally from the solar panel would also initially improve the value of the home in the hedonic model. This benefit is mainly a user value because the benefit is derived from actually accessing the resource, and it involves mostly direct user value. The increase in home values and decrease in prices paid for energy is a direct benefit that will only help mostly those using the source.
     
    The final improvement that would come out of solar industry would be quality of life improvements. Solar energy, because of its clean energy nature, promotes aesthetic beauty due to reduction in pollutants in the air and throughout the environment; it is able to create new jobs where they did not exist; and in many places, solar energy provides the only source of energy or is a much more effective source of energy. A society that has reduced pollution, which was explained through the damage function method, as a result will have many secondary benefits. One of these will be a more aesthetic world that includes a more thriving wildlife, cleaner natural spaces, increased visibility, and a cleaner living space. People will be able to feel better and dwell in an overall more aesthetically pleasing place than they can with a fossil fuel burning based area. Another quality of life improvement one can see is that new jobs will be created. Solar energy is a budding industry with many new jobs and economic opportunities available. As was the case in Germany, 60,000 jobs in the past ten years have been created that were simply not in the German economy whatsoever. As the industry continues to grow, it will continue to require more and more workers to meet rising demand. This is a place for countries that suffer from unemployment and lack of diversification to position themselves well. When more of our society has jobs, quality of life improves. Finally, solar energy provides power to a lot of remote places, which can have a number of various incentives. For example, weather technologies are being developed that will allow for PV powered devices to sit in remote locations in oceans, mountains, and various locations that will be able to sense approaching earthquakes, tsunamis, hurricanes, avalanches, and other natural disasters that can provide warnings to society.
     
    These devices can provide quality of life improvements by keeping individuals safe. In Greece, the society has seen increases in their quality of life due to the adaption of the solar powered water heater over the past thirty years. The country is second to Israel in number of solar water heaters per square mile with nearly a quarter of the country now using these heaters. This development has been very positive because it has been two-fold in its improvements on quality of life. While increasing the availability and consistency of hot water due to the sunny climate of Greece, it has also reduced inefficiencies in water heaters that use other forms of electricity that constantly have to burn fuels to stay warm. The constant availability of hot water with reductions in energy usage and money spent on energy is a definite quality of life improvement. There are endless amounts of these improvements, yet what they show is that solar energy is a viable, useful, reliable, and unique energy source that can improve our quality of life across the globe.
     
    The benefit for the improvements that are discussed can be measured effectively using contingent valuation methods. Asking individuals various questions about how much they are willing to pay to receive various quality of life improvements that would be a result of solar energy improvements will help show that people are willing to pay for improvements in their life that both have user value through the individual use of solar energy but additionally as these values extend to existence value through the improvement on public goods and improvement on aesthetics throughout the world, which would appeal to people’s inclination to stewardship and vicarious consumption. While assessing the exact amounts that people would be willing to pay is difficult to estimate, if these CVMs showed that people were willing to pay a price equal to or above the average cost per individual that switches to solar energy would cost than solar energy would be something that would be worthwhile to society.
     
    In conclusion, through this assessment of solar energy and non-renewables, one can begin to conclude that solar power provides many benefits to users and through its existence that can benefit all societies globally. The already seen benefits are just the beginning of what is possible for solar energy. While problems do exist, a continued dedication and focus on this industry can further advance the numerous benefits that have already been mentioned, which will provide our society an alleviation from the burden that fossil fuels currently place on society.
     
    Thanks and Good Investing!
     

     

     
  8. Hulk1182

    David -
    I attempted to go through your numbers but I’m not finding the same numbers you are seeing.  What is your reference for "averaged 154% increases in its operating income in the past five years?"  Also what discounted cash flow method are you using?  My numbers are different than yours.  If you want to contact me off board cpmccue@gmail.com.

  9. David Ristau

    Hulk -

    Operating Income for past five years was:

    2005 – $4.3 million

    2006 – $16.9 million

    2007 – $36.0 million

    2008 – $100 million

    2009 – $135.4 million

    Take those differences and average the percentages to get 154%. Source: http://quicktake.morningstar.com/StockNet/Income10.aspx?symbol=TSL

     

    Here is my discounted cash flow (I had to minimize to fit screen):

Dashboard

 Sector Performances (Today)

 Thermal Imaging