by Phil - June 30th, 2008 11:04 pm
That was a very disappointing finish.
Chrysler announced production cuts, shutting down a minvan plant and cutting back production at a truck plant in St. Louis later this year. Tomorrow is the June sales reports and Citibank is projecting vehicle sales will drop to 12.8M for the year, down from 16.3M last year (21%). Chrysler is down 14% this year, well ahead of F and GM and, unlike "the big 2" they remain cash-flow positive.
Chrysler is still in a tight financial situation, however, and must spend billions to develop new models and start a union-operated fund to cover retiree health-care costs. "The market is at a fairly slow point," Chrysler Vice Chairman Jim Press said in a conference call on Monday. If "we want to continue to meet or exceed our financial targets, we have to move responsibly."
Just before the announcement, at 1:20, one of the members asked me about steel stocks in general and I had said: "I’ve been staying away. High input costs and a global slowdown not a good combo for them. Also, aren’t all the auto companies cutting back production. I’m not sure what’s keeping them up this high really." In light of the announcement, I think X may make a pretty good short again. They have been a great long put to sell front-month puts again and are a little more affected by auto sales than others. I think they would have fallen already but they were added to the GS conviction buy list on the 24th but even that didn’t stop them from falling $10 since. MT may also be a fun put play as they are already looking to test weak support at $97.50.
Here is a great article on what follows bad one-month declines. I doubt it will help us feel better but at least statistics are on our side! Bloggers are most bearish in 12 months. This is how negative sentiment reinforces itself. I read Barry, the WSJ guy reads me, 100 people who show up on TV read the WSJ and there’s barely an original thought in the whole process… Interestingly, bearish blogs reduced 15% from last month AND bullish went down 3% – neutral made the 18% gain.
I have a fairly encouraging Fibonacci view of the S&P but there is a quote from the WSJ that made me question my premise that…
by pprice - June 30th, 2008 9:56 pm
Tractor Supply Company [NDQ:TSCO] June 30, 2008 close: $29.04
52-week range: $28.01 [Jan. 22, 2008] – $53.55 [Aug. 8, 2007]
Recreational farming and ranching has been booming in suburban and rural areas of America. Tractor supply serves this market with livestock and pet products, hardware, tools, snow blowers, mowers and other products. Following the acquisition of a competitor in 2002, sales and earning grew dramatically. 2007 saw all-time records in every category yet today’s poor economy has caused TSCO shares to plummet by 57% from an March 2006 high of $67.60 to just $29.04 currently.
Here are the per share numbers* since 2002:
Year …… Sales ….. Cash Flow ….. Earnings ….. Avg. P/E …. Book Value
2007 …. $72.12 …… $3.93 ……….$2.40 ……… 19.9x ………$15.08
2006 …. $58.83 …… $3.31 ……….$2.22 ……… 23.8x ………$14.87
2005 …. $52.44 …… $3.04 ……….$2.09 ……… 22.3x ………$12.11
2004 …. $45.40 …… $2.38 ……….$1.57 ……… 24.1x ………. $9.68
2003 …. $39.39 …… $2.09 ……….$1.45 ……… 19.3x ……… $7.90
2002 …. $33.18 …… $1.51 ……….$0.99 ……… 15.2x ……… $6.25
*sources: Value Line and MSN Money Central
Tractor Supply management is guiding to a range of $2.54 – $2.62 but Value Line and Zacks are taking a more conservative stance with 2008 estimates of $2.45 and $2.51 respectively.
Even the lower estimate makes TSCO’s multiple just 11.8x this year’s and 10.8x 2009’s expected earnings. Compare those to their historical P/Es in the chart above. The price/book value and price/sales are now at levels last seen during 2001’s recession. Investors who purchased during that last economic slowdown saw their shares go from a split-adjusted $2.10/share to $44.90 before the end of 2003.
Debt is low at just 16% of capital and with total interest coverage of 19x last year. Value Line awards TSCO an “A+” financial strength rating.
Despite all the positive factors these shares are now offered for a share price that is lower than the lows touched for even one day from July 2003 right through year-end 2007.
Some well known holders [as of March 31, 2008]:
Capital Research and Mgt. …………………. 11.30%
Franklin Resources ………………………….. 5.99%
AMCAP Fund ……………………………….. 6.76%
Southern Sun Asset Mgt. ……………………. 4.34%
Thomas W. Smith …………………………… 4.09%
Barclays Global Inv. …………………………. 3.21%
Neuberger Berman, LLC ……………………. 3.11%
Vanguard Group …………………………….. 2.88%
Gates (Bill and Melinda) Foundation ……….. 2.68%
Officers and Directors owned ……………….12.90%
What…
by ilene - June 30th, 2008 6:34 pm
Anyone despairing? Okay, don’t. Here’s some marginally good news for those with long positions not sufficiently hedged recently.
Courtesy of Minyanville, question by Prof. Sedacca, and answered by Prof. Jason Goepfert. – Ilene
Prof. Goepfert,
What has happened historically after months this lousy, particularly during secular bears?
Thank you,
Prof. Sedacca
Prof. Sedacca,
One of the pieces of data that’s been drifting around the past couple of days notes that this is shaping up to be the worst June in the DJIA since the Great Depression.
That’s sobering stuff, so let’s take a look at the S&P 500 and see how this month is shaping up (subject to change, of course, as the month is obviously not over just yet).
This would be the worst June swoon in the history of the index, beating June 1962 by about 1%. There was a particularly nasty 25% spill in the four months leading up to June ’62, a touch worse than what we’ve seen so far this time around. 
Overall, this month would rank 10th on the all-time dunce list, and the worst month since September 2002. Going forward there wasn’t a lot consistent about the other months. There was a generally positive bias, but that’s the case for any random month, and especially so after a down month.
Five of these "worst months" occurred during the last bear market from 2000 – 2002, and surprisingly enough the next month was positive four of the five times, and we were positive three months later three of the five. During the mostly-pathetic 1970′s, six of the months qualified for this list, and again the performance going forward was mixed to even slightly positive when looking out longer than one month. There were some huge sell-offs following these already-disastrous months, but also some major rebounds. I’m not sure that this has a ton of use other than the headline shock factor ("10th Worst Month of All Time!"), but generally there has been a positive bias following horrendous performances like this.
-Jason
by ilene - June 30th, 2008 1:58 pm
Here’s a trading idea, courtesy of Daniel Jones of Option Notions, along with a summary of his recent trades. Today’s pick is a call spread on VLO.
UPDATE: GM LONG, SPREAD
Last week we mentioned that the market was almost past the technical "Panic point" that we saw at the 11,800 Dow Industrials point. The "left field" loop appeared on Thursday with Goldman’s friendly downgrade of GM, and the mention that Goldman’s analyst figured they would have to raise capital sometime soon. Thus, the market’s vulnerability was exposed and the rest, as they say, is history. Here we sit this morning about 400 points lower. Can the bottom be far away? It’s always darkest before the dawn, and with last week’s downside action, I have to say I think we’re approaching a very tradable bottom in the markets.
We mentioned GM in a bullish pick on 16 June 2008 (ouch!) with long-term 2010 LEAPs and January 2009 calls being recommended. We don’t think the company will have to raise capital, nor will they go bankrupt. They have $40+ billion in the bank and a solid cash flow. Something will happen here from a strategic point – GM is presently valued at only $6.4 billion in equity. That’s shark bait and some private equity player will pounce. We’d like to go on record today as recommending investors add to those GM call spreads at this time. The stock is at a 53-year low this morning (30 June 2008) due to the remaining investors throwing in the towel on them for end-of-quarter window dressing, and of course, the impact perceived from higher oil prices, which are skyrocketing today. We would recommend buying another position of the January 2009 $15 calls that we are long in that spread for $1.45 this morning, and sell the Jan 2009 $25 calls for $0.30, for a net cost to the spread of $1.15. The same goes for the 2010 LEAPS if you got those long. If you didn’t, now is a great time to buy Jan 2010 $20 LEAPS at $1.55 and sell the Jan 2010 $30 LEAPS for $0.55, for a net cost of $1.00.
We sent an update on the FDX and UPS puts last week. We hope you are enjoying those and waiting for the recommended sales…
by ilene - June 30th, 2008 11:47 am
Courtesy of Notable Calls,
- Citigroup adds Google (NASDAQ:GOOG) to Top Picks Live list based on what presents itself as a highly favorable Risk-Reward outlook. Based on extensive channel checks, they believe that GOOG’s Q2 results are well on track to meet their estimates ($3.82B revenue/$4.73 EPS), despite recessionary headwinds.
- JP Morgan reits Overweight on Research in Motion (NASDAQ:RIMM), with conviction.
Notablecalls: Both look like good bounce plays here.
by ilene - June 30th, 2008 11:06 am
Here’s some more interesting information from Bespoke Investment Group:
Excerpt: "So called blue-chip stocks have struggled mightily over the last year. The total loss in market cap from their 52-week highs for stocks in the S&P 100 (largest 100 S&P stocks by market cap) is now $2.5 trillion. Below we highlight stocks in the index that are the furthest from their 52-week highs, as well as the loss in market cap from their 52-week highs. As shown, GM is 75% from its 52-week high, Lehman is 72.4%, and Wachovia is 71.7%."
Read more and see table here.
by ilene - June 30th, 2008 10:58 am
Check out the chart that’s part of this brief note, courtesy of Bespoke Investment Group’s
If any one tries to tell you differently, all you need to do is show them the chart below. As last week’s trading illustrates, every time oil went up, stocks went down, and every time oil pulled back, the market gained steam.
by Phil - June 30th, 2008 9:02 am
Oil is at $142.50.
That’s it, I can end my column there. What do you think is going to happen with oil over 100% higher than the high of Q2 last year? You can cut back your consumption by 30% but if they drive the price to $200 a barrel, you’ll be just as broke – only 30% less mobile than you were. This morning we had the usual pre-market Nigerian rebel attack… Well, that is to say according to CNBC there was a platform attack in which 5 people were killed. I’m still waiting to see it pop up on a legitimate news source but I think it’s just another case of CNBC reading Wednesday’s copy by accident on Monday, ahead of the scheduled attack. These mix-ups occur frequently in the summer when Rent-A-Rebel requires advanced notice of all attacks so as not to conflict with vacation schedules…
Don Harrold made a scheduled attack on the Fed over the weekend and I can’t say I disagree with him at this point. Certainly the free market couldn’t possibly screw the people of this country more than an active Fed has been doing lately. The only possible way I could find a legitimate justification for the Fed’s actions last week was if they KNOW, for an absolute fact, that the oil bubble is about to collapse and they are leaving liquidity in the market in order to lessen the devastation of the now $6Tn energy sector dropping 30% in short order.
With oil at $142.50, it seems more likely that Don Harrold is right and even Cramer was right, after he was wrong, and then right, and then right even though he was wrong… I spent the weekend reading lots of different viewpoints on the market and my conclusion is – nobody has a clue what’s going on so I may as well stick to my guns. My position is: I think the markets are oversold. I think that the woes of the world are entirely due to commodity prices, particularly oil, which is sucking up 10% of our Global GDP and 30% of the planet’s disposable income, taking much needed money away from housing as well as goods and services. I think the price of oil is greatly exaggerated due to speculation and I think that the price is unsustainable. That is the crux of my bullish premise so if…
by Phil - June 30th, 2008 6:39 am
Politicians often ask you if you are better of than you were 4 or 8 years ago.
I was reading some campaign rhetoric this weekend and I was amused by the fact that there are still rabid calls to "keep the Bush tax cuts" and it got me to wondering who this is really going to benefit. We all know that the US has gone 40% more in debt than when Bush took office and, obviously, inflation is out of control, especially for the things we import, like commodities.
Since core inflation is "under control," what that means is that the price of goods and services we produce in this country are not demanding more money, even with the drastic dollar deflation, and, in terms of foreign currency, we are being paid only 2/3 of what we got paid for the same amount of work or production as we did in 2000.
Now, intuitively, you may think that if the dollar has declined 40%, you need 40% more money to offset the loss but that is not the case… 40% off of 100 leaves you with 60 but – to get back to 100 – you need to multiply 60 by 1.67! This is why we try not to lose money in the markets, once you lose more than 20%, you need to do better than 30% just to get your money back.
So if you had a net worth of $10M in 2000 and voted for George Bush (or, if you lived in Florida, if you did not fully punch your chad for Gore) because you liked his tax cuts, the question you have to ask yourself is if you are 67% better off now than you were then. If you do not now have $16.7M from a $10M start, then you have lost ground. The money you worked for your entire life, not to mention the value of other assets you may have like homes, boats, cars, stocks… has been discounted by 40% over the past 7 years of Bush economic policy.
That’s why the stock market, already trading flat to 2000 levels, is much further down than you think as the Dow valued in Euros is actually already down to 6,807! This is not a math trick – a share of IBM stock (flat at $120 since 2000) that bought you 4 barrels of oil when Bush took…
by ilene - June 30th, 2008 1:43 am
Most of what I read is negative, with lots of reasons for doom and gloom, but here’s an article by Sean Udall at Minyanville discussing stocks he’s watching, thinking we may be setting up for a rally next month. – Ilene
Courtesy of Minyanville’s Sean Udall.
Here are my targets for accumulation, my potential shorts and adds thus far today. The economic numbers were about as good as they could have been, and I feel we could be setting up for a powerful rally next month. What that means is that a full robust rally won’t happen today, but certain stocks may have set or tested lows for the year this week – including today’s follow on selling. I’ve done little this week except build an ever-growing watch list.
I did add Juniper Networks (JNPR), since I felt the valuation was compelling enough to risk some downside. Additionally, I’ll share some of my current stock themes.
Visa (V): Now in the mid $79s and under, this is a good buy. I added it again, will likely clip some for a day trade and may allow some to run. Furthermore, this is one of the stocks I’ll likely use again and again in times of market weakness.
VMWare (VMW): I sold this sometime ago, but every time it hits the low $50s, I put it on the front screen. I believe virtualization will be huge and that VMWare will maintain a sizable lead despite new product releases from Microsoft (MSFT). If it goes under $50? I’ll own some.
Research In Motion (RIMM): See my comments from yesterday’s Buzz. The cellular market, like the broadband market, is bifurcated. High-end multi-function phones are replacing the lower-end handsets – see Research In Motion results versus those of the Sony (SNE)/ Ericsson (ERIC) joint venture. Some companies will defy the prevailing negativity.
I think Apple (AAPL) and Research In Motion are moving into a more dominant position every month. And the lower each of them trade, the more I like them.
Ciena Corporation (CIEN): Another nasty downturn for this…
April 26th, 2012 6:14 pm
Courtesy of Lee Adler of the Wall Street Examiner
Improvement in first time unemployment claims is slowing. Actual, not seasonally manipulated data, including an adjustment for the usual weekly upward revision, shows that the year to year rate of change is on the cusp of a possible upside breakout, which would be good news for stock market bears if it happens.
Initial Unemployment Claims Chart- Click to enlarge
Here’s why it’s mind blowing. I’ve plotted it below on an inverse scale with the S&P 500 overlaid.
Unemployemt Claims and Stock Prices - Click to enlarge
That speaks for itself. As the i...
April 4th, 2012 4:33 pm
Today’s tickers: S, FTR, JTX & SBUX
more from Caitlin
November 9th, 2011 5:48 pm
Courtesy of John Nyaradi.
Major US Markets including (NYSEARCA:DIA), (NYSEARCA:SPY), (NASDAQ:QQQ), and (NYSEARCA:IWM) dropped over 3% each on Italian bond fears and an increased worry that Europe will not be able to bail out its 4th largest economy. Furthermore, the iShares MCSI Italy Fund (NYSEARCA:EWI) wiped out over 9% today, further illustrating the dire situation in Italy and the European Union: ...November 4th, 2011 9:51 pm
Courtesy of Doug Short.
The S&P 500 broke its string of four-consecutive weekly gains with loss of 0.63% for the day and 2.48% for the week.
The index is back in the red year-to-date, down 0.35% and 8.09% below the interim high of April 29.
From an intermediate perspective, the index is 85.2% above the March 2009 closing low and 19.9% below the nominal all-time high of October 2007.
Below are two charts of the index, with and without the 50 and 200-day moving averages.
August 29th, 2011 10:52 am
Courtesy of ZeroHedge. View original post here.
Submitted by Tyler Durden.
The second economic disappointment of the day comes from the Dallas Fed, which dropped from -2.0 to -11.4 on expectations of -9.0- this was the 4th consecutive negative print month. The report was, in a word, horrible, with just 2 of the 15 constituent indices posting an increase, and the bulk solidly in the red, led by Unfilled and New Orders which dropped 16.8 and 11.2, respectively: not good for economic growth. On the employment side there was nothing good either, with both employment and hours worked declining by -...
May 25th, 2011 4:59 pm
Courtesy of Benzinga
Bloomberg reports that Diana Containerships (NASDAQ: DCIX) files to offer stock up to $172.5M. Diana Containerships says that Diana shipping will also buy $20M of stock.
Visit Benzinga >
...March 12th, 2011 12:00 am
Top 5 RisersStockRatingAnalysisVLOSTRONGBUYAn increasingly positive growth rate of past earnings, along with improving expectations for long term growth, make Valero a good prospect for high returns.KROSTRONGBUYKronos Worldwide has been gaining recognition from analysts as a good canditate for achieving higher than expected earnings along with higher overall projected valuation.SFIBUYiStar is one of the top candidates projected to achieve both higher than previously projected earnings in the short run and a higher earnings growth rate in the long run.AMATSTRONGBUYApplied Materials has been...March 6th, 2011 11:25 pm
This post is for live trades and daily comments. Please click on "comments" below to follow our live discussion. All of our current virtual trades are listed in the spreadsheet below, with entry price (1/2 in and All in), and exit prices (1/3 out, 2/3 out, and All out).
We also indicate our stop, which is most of the time the "5 day moving average". All trades, unless indicated, are front-month ATM options.
Please feel free to participate in the discussion and ask any questions you might have about this virtual portfolio, by clicking on the "comments" link right below.
To learn more about the swing trading virtual portfolio (strategy, performance, FAQ, etc.), please click here
Optrader
Swing trading virtual portfolio
One trade virtual portfolio
...March 6th, 2011 8:22 am
NEW: Elliott and Ilene are available to chat with Members regarding topics presented in SWW, comments are found below each post.
Here's the newest Stock World Weekly: Illusion Based on a Fantasy
Comments welcome... share your thoughts.
Stock World Weekly archives here >
...March 1st, 2011 9:42 am
February is now past, and the Biotech Porfolio is loaded with winners and a miss (PLX). MRK is down a bit, but I expect that trade to recover, and one could be more agressive and double down on it, or play another round at the Jan13 $30 options for roughly the same price. Below is the summary, and note the grey boxes are ones that did not fill. I am still a fan of BMRN, and like DEPO as well. Now let's look at a few others.
Table 1. PSW Biotech Plays Since January 2011
 
Our newest play is Momenta Pharmaceuticals (MNTA), who is pursuing a three-part business model which includes complex generic equivalents in partnership with the Sandoz division of Novartis, proprietary compounds, and follow-on- biologics (FOB). It seems that this company is tied up in competition/litigation wit...
Philip R. Davis is a founder Phil's Stock World, a stock and options trading site that teaches the art of options trading to newcomers and devises advanced strategies for expert traders...
Ilene is editor and affiliate program
coordinator for PSW. She manages the Favorites backup site
(blogroll, archives,
more).
Contact Ilene to learn about our affiliate and
content sharing
programs.
|
Note: The material presented in this commentary is provided for informational purposes only and is based upon information that is considered to be reliable. However, neither Philstockworld, LLC (PSW) nor its affiliates warrant its completeness, accuracy or adequacy and it should not be relied upon as such. Neither PSW nor its affiliates are responsible for any errors or omissions or for results obtained from the use of this information. Past performance, including the tracking of virtual trades and portfolios for educational purposes, is not necessarily indicative of future results. Neither Phil, Optrader, or anyone related to PSW is a registered financial adviser and they may hold positions in the stocks mentioned, which may change at any time without notice. Do not buy or sell based on anything that is written here, the risk of loss in trading is great.
This material is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any security or other financial instrument. Securities or other financial instruments mentioned in this material are not suitable for all investors. Any opinions expressed herein are given in good faith, are subject to change without notice, and are only intended at the moment of their issue as conditions quickly change. The information contained herein does not constitute advice on the tax consequences of making any particular investment decision. This material does not take into account your particular investment objectives, financial situations or needs and is not intended as a recommendation to you of any particular securities, financial instruments or strategies. Before investing, you should consider whether it is suitable for your particular circumstances and, as necessary, seek professional advice. |
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn 
del.icio.us
Digg
German
Spanish
French
Italian
Portuguese
Japanese
Korean
Russian
Chinese